Bill Gates and the 75 Million Acres of Trees – Separating Fact from Fiction

Recently, a controversial claim has gone viral across various social media platforms, alleging that Bill Gates has announced plans to cut down 75 million acres of trees and bury them as part of an effort to combat climate change, accompanied by the hashtag #Climatescam. This assertion has generated significant controversy and debate on social media. As the spread of such claims can contribute to misinformation and confusion, it is crucial to separate fact from fiction and clearly understand the truth behind the claim.

In this fact-checking endeavor, we will examine the available evidence, consult credible sources, and provide a comprehensive analysis to shed light on whether there is any substance to the claim that Bill Gates intends to undertake a massive tree-cutting and burial operation to address climate change. Let’s delve into the details to uncover the truth behind this viral assertion and its implications in the broader context of climate change mitigation efforts.

Social media Post

Some social media posts try to convince the public that Bill Gates is trying to destroy 75 million acres of trees by the name of “climate change,” it`s a sarcastic act.

Facebook Link   | Archived

 Facebook link | Archived

We decided to investigate this. 

Explanation

Recent reports have suggested that Bill Gates’s organization, Breakthrough Energy, is investing $6.6 million into a project led by Kodama Systems, which is purportedly aimed at cutting down 70 million acres of forests, primarily in the Western United States, and burying the felled trees. The project organizers argue that planting trees can reduce global warming by preventing the alleged release of carbon into the atmosphere. They intend to achieve this by using “earthen vaults,” which are dry and oxygen-free spaces designed for carbon sequestration, rather than utilizing the trees for conventional purposes such as timber for housing.

While this information may raise eyebrows and prompt questions about its environmental impact, it is essential to scrutinize the claims made by the project coordinators. Notably, using terms like “scientists” and asserting that burying trees will prevent them from “spewing” carbon back into the air warrants careful examination.

Amid a vigorous debate and widespread social media sharing, a pivotal question emerges: Can the audacious method of felling and burying trees emerge as a groundbreaking solution in the relentless struggle against global warming? This inquiry lies at the heart of the project’s contentious nature, prompting us to delve deep into this unconventional endeavor’s science, potential benefits, and environmental ramifications.

Could felling and burying trees help fight global warming? Chances –

Cutting down trees and strategically burying excess wood could be a valuable tool in the fight against global warming. The research findings of Ning Zeng, an atmospheric scientist, suggest that carbon sequestration through this method could potentially offset the carbon emissions generated by fossil fuels. Using specific burial depths and techniques, Zeng’s calculations indicate the capacity to sequester considerable amounts of carbon per hectare, making this a concept worth exploring further. The ancient Amazonian biochar practice and terra preta formation inadvertently achieved carbon sequestration while enriching soil quality. These examples underscore the potential long-term benefits of such practices, even when their original purpose may not have been carbon capture. Modern technologies like hydrothermal carbonization suggest that scaling up wood burial for carbon sequestration may be plausible. The possibility of qualifying for carbon credits adds incentive to develop these methods.

Instead of letting this carbon be released into the atmosphere, one strategy is to bury the biomass of trees or other plant material to prevent it from decomposing or burning. This can be done through biochar production, where organic matter is heated in a low-oxygen environment to create a stable form of carbon that can be buried.

It is not without challenges and uncertainties. Implementing large-scale wood burial schemes would require careful planning and consideration to ensure minimal environmental impact and potential methane emissions.

Link. Archived 

The scheme involves three key steps:

– Enabling forest access

– Selecting burial sites or constructing above-ground storage shelters

– The selective collection and burial of dead wood

The author envisions a network of accessible forest paths and spaced trenches for carbon burial, emphasizing the potential for substantial carbon storage in large forested areas. The frequency of carbon burial depends on various factors, striking a balance between operational costs and the imperative to prevent dead trees from contributing to carbon emissions. Particularly in regions with existing road infrastructure, and underscores the role of economic incentives, such as carbon trading, in driving its implementation. While the potential for carbon sequestration is significant, challenges exist in accessing remote forest regions, and the importance of conservation and governance in addressing these issues is emphasized. Overall, the wood burial scheme presents a viable method to combat climate change through efficient carbon sequestration practices while acknowledging the complexities and considerations of managing global forest resources.

Read more   Archived 

This approach has both merits and drawbacks that require careful consideration. While various methods may require some level of adoption, wood burial is an appealing choice due to its advantages: it is cost-effective, technologically simple, widely applicable, easily monitored, safe, and reversible, making it a prudent, no-regret strategy. However, it’s essential to exercise caution when considering large-scale implementation, given that forests are invaluable resources endowed by Mother Nature, serving critical ecological functions and fulfilling human needs. 

In the face of persistent doubts and controversy surrounding burying trees to combat global warming, it becomes increasingly evident that more extensive research is desirable and crucial. Implementing such a strategy is a matter of global significance, with far-reaching implications for our planet’s climate, ecosystems, and the balance of nature. As we grapple with the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change, every potential avenue warrants careful exploration. However, the skepticism and concerns raised by various stakeholders should not be dismissed lightly. Instead, they should serve as a catalyst for rigorous, transparent, and multidisciplinary research that delves deep into this strategy’s environmental, economic, and social aspects. 

If you have any queries or come across suspicious content related to climate change or the environment and want us to verify them for you, then send them to us on our WhatsApp hotline: +917045366366 

-With inputs from Dinesh Balasri –